Barcelona 3 Chelsea 0

Chelsea played well y above expectation at acampar Nou mid-week, but they still were lacking when it pertained to breaking debajo Barcelona’s defence y finding the target ~ above their many shots take away — uneven Barça. Thus, let’s run into ns details of what makes this Champions league return leg uno sour affair for us.

Tu lees esto: Barcelona 3 chelsea 0

(NB: barna stats on ns left — or orange in graphic — and Chelsea on ns right — or azul on graphics. Us didn’t select these colours.)

GENERAL STATS
no no

*
very first half stats no
As discussed in the match report, barcelona had 45 touches come Chelsea’s 2 — both bounces on two players desde the English lado — to open up their score desde Messi’s shot from a rather picar angle yet still convert with los help the Thibaut Courtois’ fail to close his legs on ns attempt.

But despite ns very early on blow the Blues maintained on trying. Desde that punto on we observed Chelsea react an extremely well to the fact that staying behind and seeking a objetivo on ns counter would alguno longer it is in an option.

Barcelona if still a possession-heavy team have become an ext pragmatic under los management of Ernesto Valverde, following back-to-back trouncings by Real la capital de españa in both legs of ns Spanish Super cup at the comienzo of ns season. Last Wednesday, they placed on uno great defensa shift to save Chelsea in ~ bay and were más alto in every defensa statistic including aerial duels, winning 6 of siete challenges in ns first half.

Most importantly, they had loads of blocks especially desde centre-backs Gerard Piqué y Samuel Umtiti to cut los workload that goalkeeper Marc-André ter Stegen. Therefore Chelsea in reality had more shots registered 보다 Barça with 6 against 4 from the hosts. But they had 3 of your attempts on objetivo including 2 goals representar Messi y Ousmane Dembélé if we only managed 2 of our to hit los target.


no

*
no Second fifty percent stats
Barcelona’s two-goal lead in ns first half allowed them to focus less on attack y more ~ above protecting the scoreline. So Chelsea go forward and did rather well with creating chances.

The finishing but still faltered. That course barcelona were still placing on uno great defensivo effort but ns troubles in shooting that have plagued our season were once again a presence in los second half.

In fact Chelsea dominated possession, with 52% ball retention come Barça’s 48%, as well as shots with 8 versus 4 from Barcelona. However Chelsea hit just one shot on goal while barna were best on target con all of your attempts, one of which to be Messi’s second anotado to make the score 3-0.

Drat.

SHOTS no

*
it is not everyday that you have actually an away lado “out-shooting” Barcelona 14 to 8. But los conversion price of those tourists was so poor that they may not even be thought about much of uno threat once you have by your side someone choose Messi in an influenced night who additionally elevates the level of play of those around him.

Even with Valverde’s pragmatism they are still very classic Barça-esque in style, opting to take many of their shots in the box as presented by the 7 trials they had in ns area to only uno outside of it. Chelsea yet are not so attached come these principles as 5 of their attempts were desde long.

Another significant difference is in ns type of theatre in i m sorry shooting opportunities came from. 36% of ours were desde set pieces while Barcelona’s were 25%. In absolute numbers, those are 5 shots in 14 Chelsea attempted against dos in ocho to Barça.


no

*
no supposed Goals período Match Time; Source:
11tegen11 no
no
*
supposed Goals término Shot Location; Source:
Funnily enough ns Expected purposes maps show that neither side created good chances to score as also though Chelsea were in an excellent positions come shoot, they quiet missed the target as result of blocks or straight negative aim. Barça however had Messi whose one of best strengths is los ability to make impossible things for habituales players to execute seem entirely possible. Such as ns two shots representar very picar angles that can only be convert by uno player that his silk.

ATTACK no

*
no strike sides; Source: Whoscored.com in spite of having Messi and Luis suárez working as a pair that strikers, most of Barcelona’s attacking move were done at the flank con 79% the those balanced between ns left and right political parties of ns pitch. Much of the was a response come our wing-backs advertise up on their flanks together Barça’s amplio midfielders y fullbacks did los same, ns former much much more than los latter.

Chelsea’s advancements were additionally mainly done on the flanks, most of the on los right página where Willian currently acts — something which has become a common happenstance in our most recent games. 37% of our ataque actions took place there and so Chelsea were a little bit much more balanced many thanks to our amplio attackers taking their path and cutting inside, and/or the long passes searching for striker Olivier Giroud exhilaration as a target man/option to carry ourselves forward.


no no

*
no Dribbles attempted; Source: Whoscored.com no
*
no Dribbles completed; Source: Whoscored.com no
Further illustrating ns attack sides map we have los dribbling maps over which shows how barna rarely check dribbling through ns middle, maybe as uno result of Chelsea having N’Golo Kanté constantly sweeping los area for tackles, interceptions y whatever else he might do come remove ns hosts’ possession. Meanwhile Chelsea make the efforts were an ext spread y more successful.

*
no barcelona offensive stats no There is cuales way to attract attentions to anyone yet Messi in the separar stats analysis. Ns Argentinian hit all of his 3 shots, scoring 2 goals. Also, his solamente key pass was converted into a objetivo by Dembélé in the first half.

And that does not stop right here as he to be also really effective con his dribbling, helping barcelona breakthroughs by completing 6 dribbles in 8 trials. He however had cuatro dispossessions and 2 unstable touches... Is it a sign the decline?

(I kid!)

no

*
Chelsea ofensiva stats Chelsea’s collective stats are not that bad either if you ignore ns “Shots OT” tower on the table. Also our finest shooter of ns night in marcos Alonso struggle only one of his cuatro attempts on Ter Stegen’s goal.

And no surprises displayed as Willian was for that knows how countless games our main “exhaust”, with siete out of 10 dribbles completed. His companion on los opposite flank Eden peril was not virtually as good, going 3 in 5.

Other highlights are Cesc Fàbregas with cinco key passes, return this is not much of uno “highlight” as it is his main task in this team with his ever-declining skills everywhere else in the game; y N’Golo Kanté completing 100% of his dribbles. If just he manages to boost his shoot skills...

GOALKEEPING

*
In goalkeeping jobs Ter Stegen, regardless of having his opponents registering catorce shots to his side’s 8, go not need to work as lot as Courtois since the German’s backline were having an English premier League-esque night in prevent oncoming shots ~ above target. Whereas ns Belgian faced 7 shots, consisting of one representar a chance he created out of ns wrong aprobar to Suárez, and saved 4 of them.

Despite the Courtois did fine in his distribution, with ns 60% success con his largo punts versus 27% desde Ter Stegen. Still, on ns skills the matter the most ours goalkeeper faltered. Sad, sad affair.

PASSING
no no

*
no
It was ns night against Barcelona and as expected they conquered every passing graph in volume yet one: overcome headed to your attacking third. Which is not much of un surprise considering their attitude towards placing themselves at danger going forward once los 1-0 lead to be built.

Ver más: Anunciación De La Encarnacion Del Hijo De Dios, La Encarnacion Del Hijo De Dios

No wonder most of los actions that took location in Wednesday’s night were in los middle of the pitch, which concentrated 47% that those. In 2nd came the home third — as in the página Chelsea to be attacking yet not being really effective in doing for this reason — con 32%.

no no

*
barcelona passing stats no Left-back Jordi Alba had los most touches on los ball in the game with 77, when midfielder Ivan Rakitic was the champion in the volume of passes with setenta completions and 74 attempts.

Andrés Iniesta, who miraculous recovery from a hamstring injury had actually him returning much more than a week earlier than very first expected simply so the could confront Chelsea in ns first leg, to be Barcelona’s many effective transeúnte by misplacing simply one of 35 passes in the 56 minutes he continued to be on the pitch. Alguno wonder Valverde risked his early regresar to the pitch, return not having actually immediate philippe Coutinho backup accessible to ns tie likewise played ns huge function in los decision.

no no

*
no no Barça pass map; Source:
11tegen11 Passing maps have arrows i beg your pardon shows the combination of overcome made between players, and the thicker los arrow ns most passes taken place in those interchanges. As we deserve to see ns left lado of barcelona did not attach much with their attack, con passes ticking in between Alba and Sergio Busquets and then con Alba y Iniesta. Ns right flank despite was much busier as links were made desde right-back Sergi Roberto, Rakitic and Dembélé come Messi — y vice-versa.

*
On los touches’ ranking, over there was un tie in Chelsea’s camp between Willian y Cesc. Both players had 77 touches on ns ball in the camp Nou trip, although Willian had actually only cuarenta y ocho passes to Cesc’s 69.

Defender Andreas Christensen remains as los most accurate transeúnte of our coporación, grupo with un 97.2% success in 36 attempts, definition he only made one wrong ocurrir in los entire game. Additionally this hora around it was not the youngster who made ns mistake in possession. This fell instead ~ above veteran César Azpilicueta, whose long attempt looking for Willian was intercepted by Jordi Alba who then initiated the juego for Barcelona’s 3rd score.

And the was a good night for Cesc in regards to displaying his pass skills. His 84.1% accuracy may not it is in that good but at los very the very least he uncovered his target on every one of his 7 long overcome attempted. Even if countless of those went to waste con the eventualmente pass provided by ours attackers, or ns shooting attempts going awry for whichever reasons.

*
Chelsea passing map; Source:
11tegen11 Passes initiated representar Courtois would normally go come Azpilicueta, who could move it front to Victor moisés or Cesc on los right, or switch it sideways to Christensen that would move it to ns left of our pitch towards Antonio Rüdiger.

Cesc as anticipated was ns “beacon” of our attacks, back Kanté carried un lot of load on these as well. Passes desde the midfield most tiempo would come searching for our forwards, with Kanté at tiempo looking to connect Alonso down the left flank. And from deep, we would look regularly towards ours wing-backs with los Spaniard being really effective going on ns offence, uneven his equivalent Moses.

DEFENDING
no

*
no Clearances; Source: Whoscored.com no
Barcelona were additionally relentless, but not quite effective in your tackling. Los maps already show that they to be not an extremely successful in this regard however to put it in numbers, lock made 24 tackles in 44 attempts.

no

*
no no Fouls; Source: Whoscored.com another interesting point to progressive is the distribution that fouls on ns pitch. Chelsea recorded 17 fouls come Barcelona’s once and 10 of those from the Blues were excellent on the hosts’ half. While in our half, we did well no to give Messi straight hits in ~ our goal even if those were not essential for him to dismantle us.

Barcelona, on the barrage of assaults they had to endure during ns times in which us had ns ball in our grasp, had actually at veces to stop us with fouling. From these came some of our shots including Alonso’s direct hit in ~ their torpost that might have been his empleado Ramires moment. If only it walk in...

no

*
no no Aerial duels; Source: Whoscored.com contrasted to the Premier liga games we extended at these components we had much much less work to perform in ns air, as barcelona are ns team the likes to keep los ball on the ground and are normally not very an excellent in aerial duels. However on Wednesday castle had ns great day in this part of the game, even if they enabled Chelsea come win dos of four aerial difficulties in their 18-yard box — both of which winner by Rüdiger.

*
barcelona defensive stats most of Barcelona’s “dirty work” was done by their defenders, although the midfield con Rakitic y then Paulinho were additionally quite reliable in ns tackling department. In any kind of case, that is hard not to draw our eyes into the stats that Umtiti that made siete interceptions, 3 clearances y got tres shots blocked in his mission to store Chelsea quiet.

no

*
no Chelsea defensivo stats no N’Golo Kanté is uno (tackling) god amongst men.

no

*
no Players’ positions; Source: Whoscored.com no In terms of average positions, barcelona kept a cuadra of 6 players behind los half-line of los pitch with their fullbacks drawn backwards to manage Chelsea’s threats on lejos areas, follow me with a pair that midfielders in Rakitic and Busquets stuck in the middle. Los wide midfielders hence moved forward, Dembélé giving much more width on your right and Iniesta dropping further inside with ns attacking hilera of Messi y Suárez.

Chelsea progressed their lines many thanks to Barça’s early anotado which also got ns hosts to drop themselves deep right into their very own areas. Our wing-backs thrust up together high together they could, staying lejos as los wide attackers reduce into central areas trying to find plays come string together and positions to take shots. Alguno wonder Giroud is showed with his average position behind both Willian y Eden together he regularly dropped back to fight because that balls con Barcelona’s players and do ns pivot to the rest of ns team in your advances.

CONCLUSION

The scoreline makes ns whole affair lot uglier 보다 it yes, really looks. And it would certainly not be un stretch come say that we have to be proud of what Chelsea controlled to lot at acampar Nou mid-week.

It is no every day that you will certainly see uno side, even los best in ns world, pinning barcelona down like we did at their patria stadium. We additionally had some an extremely bad luck con our shots although this has been un recurrent theme that has already been debated at length in these parts, however may need uno further look in los future.

At the end of the all, the biggest difference-makers to be Messi’s end on his Chelsea curse y the amazing job-related done by Barcelona’s defence, particularly during ns second fifty percent of the game when Chelsea were totally dominating the hosts ~ above every aspect but defence. Y in uno night where our own difference-maker was not up for ns occasion, ns gap between ns two teams just widened even if all thanks to just one player.

Ver más: Como Cocinar Col Lombarda : 10 Recetas Para Sacar Provecho A Sus Propiedades

It goes without saying the if we save up this kind of effort on every performance we have actually until the end of los season and beyond, we have the right to still end up it all on a pretty good note to bring onto the new term. Yet this hinges on los team being keen ~ above regularly putting these display screens in los games left on our schedule.